Thursday November 15 01:21 PM EST  

U.S. Policy Towards Taliban Influenced by Oil - Say Authors
By Julio Godoy, Inter Press Service  

PARIS, Nov 15 (IPS) - Under the influence of U.S. oil companies, the government of
George W. Bush initially blocked U.S. secret service investigations on terrorism,
while it bargained with the Taliban the delivery of Osama bin Laden (news - web
sites) in exchange for political recognition and economic aid, two French
intelligence analysts claim.  

In the book ''Bin Laden, la verite interdite'' (''Bin Laden, the forbidden truth''), that
appeared in Paris on Wednesday, the authors, Jean-Charles Brisard and
Guillaume Dasquie, reveal that the Federal Bureau of Investigation's deputy
director John O'Neill resigned in July in protest over the obstruction.  

Brisard claim O'Neill told them that ''the main obstacles to investigate Islamic
terrorism were U.S. oil corporate interests and the role played by Saudi Arabia in it''.  

The two claim the U.S. government's main objective in Afghanistan (news - web
sites) was to consolidate the position of the Taliban regime to obtain access to the
oil and gas reserves in Central Asia.  

They affirm that until August, the U.S. government saw the Taliban regime ''as a
source of stability in Central Asia that would enable the construction of an oil
pipeline across Central Asia'', from the rich oilfields in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan,
and Kazakhstan, through Afghanistan and Pakistan, to the Indian Ocean.  

Until now, says the book, ''the oil and gas reserves of Central Asia have been
controlled by Russia. The Bush government wanted to change all that''.  

But, confronted with Taliban's refusal to accept U.S. conditions, ''this rationale of
energy security changed into a military one'', the authors claim.  

''At one moment during the negotiations, the U.S. representatives told the Taliban,
'either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of
bombs','' Brisard said in an interview in Paris.  

According to the book, the government of Bush began to negotiate with the Taliban
immediately after coming into power in February. U.S. and Taliban diplomatic
representatives met several times in Washington, Berlin and Islamabad.  

To polish their image in the United States, the Taliban even employed a U.S. expert
on public relations, Laila Helms. The authors claim that Helms is also an expert in
the works of U.S. secret services, for her uncle, Richard Helms, is a former director
of the Central Intelligence Agency (news - web sites) (CIA (news - web sites)).  

The last meeting between U.S. and Taliban representatives took place in August,
five weeks before the attacks on New York and Washington, the analysts maintain.  

On that occasion, Christina Rocca, in charge of Central Asian affairs for the U.S.
government, met the Taliban ambassador to Pakistan in Islamabad.  

Brisard and Dasquie have long experience in intelligence analysis. Brisard was
until the late 1990s director of economic analysis and strategy for Vivendi, a French
company. He also worked for French secret services, and wrote for them in 1997 a
report on the now famous Al Qaeda network, headed by bin Laden.  

Dasquie is an investigative journalist and publisher of Intelligence Online, a
respected newsletter on diplomacy, economic analysis and strategy, available
through the Internet.  

Brisard and Dasquie draw a portrait of closest aides to President Bush (news -
web sites), linking them to oil business.  

Bush's family has a strong oil background. So are some of his top aides. From the
U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney (news - web sites), through the director of the
National Security Council Condoleeza Rice, to the Ministers of Commerce and
Energy, Donald Evans and Stanley Abraham, all have for long worked for U.S. oil
companies.  

Cheney was until the end of last year president of Halliburton, a company that
provides services for oil industry; Rice was between 1991 and 2000 manager for
Chevron; Evans and Abraham worked for Tom Brown, another oil giant.  

Besides the secret negotiations held between Washington and Kabul and the
importance of the oil industry, the book takes issue with the role played by Saudi
Arabia in fostering Islamic fundamentalism, in the personality of bin Laden, and
with the networks that the Saudi dissident built to finance his activities.  

Brisard and Dasquie contend the U.S. government's claim that it had been
prosecuting bin Laden since 1998. ''Actually,'' Dasquie says, ''the first state to
officially prosecute bin Laden was Libya, on the charges of terrorism.''  

''Bin Laden wanted settle in Libya in the early 1990s, but was hindered by the
government of Muammar Qaddafi,'' Dasquie claims. ''Enraged by Libya's refusal,
bin Laden organised attacks inside Libya, including assassination attempts
against Qaddafi.''  

Dasquie singles out one group, the Islamic Fighting Group (IFG), reputedly the
most powerful Libyan dissident organisation, based in London, and directly linked
with bin Laden.  

''Qaddafi even demanded Western police institutions, such as Interpol, to pursue
the IFG and bin Laden, but never obtained co- operation,'' Dasquie says. ''Until
today, members of IFG openly live in London.''  

The book confirms earlier reports that the U.S. government worked closely with the
United Nations (news - web sites) during the negotiations with the Taliban.  

''Several meetings took place this year, under the arbitration of Francesc Vendrell,
personal representative of UN secretary general Kofi Annan (news - web sites), to
discuss the situation in Afghanistan,'' says the book.  

''Representatives of the U.S. government and Russia, and the six countries that
border with Afghanistan were present at these meetings,'' it says. ''Sometimes,
representatives of the Taliban also sat around the table.''  

These meetings, also called ''6+2'' because of the number of states (six
neighbours plus U.S. and Russia) involved, have been confirmed by Naif Naik,
former Pakistani Minister for Foreign Affairs.  

In a French television news programme two weeks ago, Naik said during a ''6+2''
meeting in Berlin in July, the discussions turned around ''the formation of a
government of national unity. If the Taliban had accepted this coalition, they would
have immediately received international economic aid.''  

''And the pipe lines from Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan would have come,'' he added.  

Naik also claimed that Tom Simons, the U.S. representative at these meetings,
openly threatened the Taliban and Pakistan.  

''Simons said, 'either the Taliban behave as they ought to, or Pakistan convinces
them to do so, or we will use another option'. The words Simons used were 'a
military operation','' Naik claimed.