Baghdad moves its chemical weapons factories
Monday, October 22, 2001
By Jessica Berry in London
Saddam Hussein has relocated his chemical weapons factories after
the first case of anthrax poisoning in the United States in apparent anticipation
of an imminent bombardment by the US-led coalition.
A senior Western intelligence official said that since the death of a
picture editor in Florida on October5 there had been a "mass movement
of weapons" to protected no-go areas in the north, north-west and west
of Iraq.
"The entire contents of their chemicals weapons factories around Baghdad
have been moving through the nights to specially built bunkers," he said.
Before the September11 attacks, Saddam had put his troops on high alert,
but little was done at the time to move crucial weaponry. When the Pentagon
said it was investigating the possibility that Iraq might not only have
been involved in the assault on the New York towers but may also have
been behind the anthrax attacks in the US, it began moving its chemical
weapons factories.
Western intelligence officers said on Saturday that the north-east region
of Hemrin was the centre of most activity. Saddam ordered his troops to
dig 18-metre-deep holes in the area and to bury chemical and biological
cargo arriving from the capital. Six pits have been dug. Meanwhile, factories
that make missiles and chemical weapons had been relocated to Baiji and
al-Safar, in the north-west.
"These are heavily protected no-go areas with massive infrastructure,"
an intelligence officer said. "They have everything: bunkers, sophisticated
communications systems and living quarters for the military and senior
intelligence officers."
Scott Ritter, a former UN weapons inspector between 1991 and 1998, cautioned
against blaming Iraq for the attacks. While it was true the regime "had
not fully complied with its disarmament obligation, particularly in the
field of biological weapons", he said, the failure did not "equate to
a retained biological weapons capability". Accusations that Iraq was the
source of the anthrax were unsubstantiated and irresponsible, he said.
|