� More Death! | Main | Malkin Extends Her Rant Against Kwanzaa �

October 15, 2005

A Black Conservative Response to James Thindwa

Somebody I don't know, named James Thindwa is talking about 'black conservatives', that monolithic poltical boogie man. So, departing from my usual dismissal of all things written in The Black Commentator, I respond briefly. He doesn't know me, so we're equal.

First off he starts with dealing with Star Parker's attitude towards welfare. I think he does so without even knowing that Star Parker was on welfare, and everything she says about it comes from her personal experience and repulsion by it. I think Star Parker is at least as credible on the evils of welfare as any ex-convict is about the evils of the criminal justice system. But I've also met her personally and I know she has class. So I tend to defend her as a matter of principle, just, I suppose as some people defend Mumia Abu Jamal.

Thindwa says:

Minimum Wage and Living Wage: Black conservative opposition to raising the minimum wage and rejection of living wage proposals across the country puts them squarely at odds with the vast majority of black people who are stuck in low-wage jobs.

This is an old species of argument I call using the black race as a rhetorical human sheild. You bring in the spectre of a 'vast majority' of African Americans and suggest that their political interest is singular, and any opposition to that interest is not just wrong but anti-black. You therefore evade the fundamental economic argument. This black conservative says that the minimum wage is a species of wage inflation that works against employment. Thomas Sowell made the argument 20 years ago and the economics are still the same. You can have more low skill jobs with no minimum wage or you can have fewer low skill jobs with minimum wage. There's no two ways around it. Given a preference, I say the culture of work is better served by eliminating the minimum wage. Wal-Mart aint bad. I know, I've had worse jobs myself.

Thindwa says:

Speaking out against racism: Black conservatives seem unable to instinctively convey revulsion over racism or its vivid manifestations. When a James Byrd is dragged behind a pickup truck, crosses are burned in front of black homes, or a Trent Lott or William Bennett utters racially offensive rants, black conservatives need to be as resolute as Jesse Jackson in criticizing it.

Thindwa is just not informed. 'Instinctive revulsion' makes me think about dog vomit, not a policy against racism. But instintive revulsion is not a bad idea when it comes to reaction to racist incidents. The question is whether or not we sit around in dog vomit all year round. People have better things to do. The man who killed James Byrd was the first white man to be sentenced to death for lynching. Justice was swift and appropriate, so why is Thindwa using that example? As for acting like Jesse Jackson... puhlease. That was another generation.

This black conservative has gone to great lengths to differentiate degrees of racism and appropriate responses to them. It is not a binary matter and one shouldn't simply flip the racism switch that sounds the siren at full blast. Anyway. This site is replete with examples. Search for yourself if you're not lazy.

Thindwa says:

African Americans respect intellectual and political independence: Right or wrong, black conservatives are often seen as defenders of, and apologists for white racism.

Would somebody give me a nice Latin phrase for this kind of logical fallacy? You know, that 'right or wrong there is this perception that..'. Aside from all that, Thindwa is back into the dog vomit.

This black conservative has no tolerance for white racism, and I've never met one who had it. What I have seen, however, is a stunning lack of props for those white conservatives who stand against white supremacy. Then again, I don't often go there. Here's the reference, you tell me if you've seen it before or if you're still tripping off Chuck D's "..the KKK wears three piece suits." What a brother know? As for Mr. Bennett, really. Get over it.

Thindwa writes:

Affirmative action matters to black people. The knee-jerk references to “merit” and “qualification” made by conservatives every time affirmative action is debated lack credibility, especially now when the Bush administration is stacking government bureaucracies such as FEMA with incompetent friends. In light of such obvious cronyism, opposition to affirmative action is seen merely as a conservative strategy for maintaining white privilege.

Huh, what? FEMA? Malcolm X found fault with affirmative action, and this black conservative does for the same reasons. But I'm really not going to do battle over this tired little point. It would be nice for Bositis or somebody to give us all a little statistic about what difference in unemployment continuing Affirmative Action makes. Then we could all say it's ump-de-ump jobs and be done with it. My guess? 10k per year total. Which might be something like a tenth of a percent in overall narrowing of the unemployment gap between black and white. An economic drop in the bucket. Affirmative Action isn't black power, it's integration.

This black conservative defends Affirmative Action weakly
. With nuance and skill, I might add. But most importantly with an eye on reality and not cosmic justice.

Thindwa pontificates:

The environment and workplace safety matters: Environmental racism is a reality. As long as black conservatives are seen as defenders of an unfettered free enterprise system that disregards the environment and public safety, no one in the black community will take them seriously.

Remember that old joke when the patient comes to the doctor and says, "It hurts when I do this?" C'mon, you remember. The doctor says, all together now "Don't do that." Is there anybody on the planet who doesn't know that it hurts to live in the ghetto?

Leave.

This black conservative is a defender of social mobility and the freedom for blackfolks to move anywhere in the country. If blackfolks are unwilling to vote with their feet, I'm not going to load them up in boxcars and send them someplace I think is appropriate for them. If there were no toxic waste anyplace in the state of Utah, would Thindwa advocate that blackfolks move? Moving to the burbs is cheaper than cleaning up the hood. This is basic economics.

Thindwa has the unmitigated gall to say:

Katrina has deepened black opposition to the Iraq War: Regardless of its merits, the failure of the government to respond to Katrina’s victims has deepened black opposition to the Iraq War and exacerbated an already palpable backlash.

Conservative rule number one: DONT RELY ON THE GOVERNMENT. Hello?

Black conservatives were here before Katrina and will be here afterwards. There's really not a cogent response to be made to this rather incoherent argument. But if you have to go through New Orleans to get to Iraq, then I say go through General Honore. This black conservative and son of a US Marine says, quit whining. And while we're at it, I'm looking forward to the liberal whining about Jamie Foxx's upcoming role as a sargeant in Iraq. I hope he brings back memories of Lou Gossett Jr. We can hope.

Thindwa writes a couple piddly sentences about health care that don't bear repeating. Everybody knows that the American health care system is broken.

Thindwa completely ignores Glenn Loury, probably the most reputable black conservative around by scribbling:

Historical racism: Any analysis of the present black condition that denies its link to historical racism, seeks to locate the “black problem” wholly within the individual and denies the presence of structural barriers to social and economic mobility will not be taken seriously.

Even if you start with Massey and Denton, a great place to start, you realize that the greatest structural component of racism is residential segregation. IE, living in the all-black ghetto, is the most dangerous component of the legacy of slavery. The legacy of slavery and Jim Crow is written in the walls of the buildings that were there since those days. Let's make that clear and accept that premise.

If you leave the ghetto and live in communities that don't have a history of segregation, because they were built after the Civil Rights Movement, then you have elminated the very tallest walls that hold blackfolks back. There is no legacy of slavery in Cerritos, CA, the home of Tiger Woods. It was built after Jim Crow was defeated. If you refuse to leave the ghetto, then it's your fault.

So the proposition I continually pose to progressives and liberals who claim that Afrocentrism and other cultural tools are effective in countering the legacy of slavery is this. If it works, then the failure of the ghetto is the failure of the appropriate sirens of healing blackness to reach their own experimental subjects people. If it doesn't work, then the failure of the ghetto is economic. Your choice. Don't blame black conservatives. We didn't create the plantation, we escaped. Come on over, the water's fine.

Thindwa continues:

Foreign policy for the people: Black conservatives’ uncritical support for trade deals such as NAFTA and CAFTA that have played a role in the de-industrialization of American cities will win them no allies in black communities. And black people view with suspicion conservative attacks on leaders such as Hugo Chavez of Venezuela that do not acknowledge the source of his popularity: the largest share of the county’s oil revenue goes to fight poverty.

I have a hard time believing that the black masses are putting 17 and 34 together and coming up with a prime number which is the key to foreign policy. Blackfolks know about Hugo Chavez because he's a loudmouth pseudo-socialist, and as such he resonates with a goodly number of other loudmouth pseudo-socialists who spend a lot of time condescending to black people in a ghetto near you. When America is ready to elect a socialist president or even a socialist city council member, I'll pay attention. Meanwhile, I say whatever to this argument. Sheesh. Hugo Chavez.

Thindwa crunches out the following massive conspiratorial sentence:

Racial discrimination is a reality: The wave of successful class-action suits in recent years (against the FBI, Denny’s, Wal-Mart, and so on), funding inequities in education, disparities in the criminal justice system (17 black inmates have been released from death row in Illinois, vindicated by DNA evidence), discrimination in employment (ironically, with the exception of Fox News Sunday, Sunday morning TV news programming in the “liberal media” is now off-limits to black commentators and opinion makers), all conspire to undermine black progress.

Back to the dog vomit, this time with overtones of hegemony. All pretty heavy stuff considering the fourth word after the colon. One of these days we'll actually hear about the caseload from the EEOC and talk about the disposition of cases. Until we get to that detail, I'm really not going to trouble myself with the 6 thousand blackfolks who have been walloped by racism serious enough to merit a civil lawsuit.

Thindwa accuses:

Attacks on black leaders: No matter what they think of Jackson, Sharpton, Representatives Maxine Waters, John Lewis and others, black conservatives’ vitriolic attacks on the black civil rights leadership will never work. Whatever the merits, when Star Parker, Armstrong Williams, Larry Elder and other conservatives attack black leaders in a personal way (as opposed to reasoned, honest and constructive engagement), they are seen by many black people simply as attack dogs for the white Republican establishment.

To this I say stuff it. You simply have to take it as a given that black people disagree. Vehemently. To the death. In politics as in life, anger, frustration and denial are reality. That's what it's all about. We don't like you and you don't like us. Get over it. Fight an honorable battle, but don't complain that you have to fight. God what a wuss. You want to call us dogs for the white Republican establishment, go have a field day. Here, I'll even give you some better names.

How about this: "a graduate of the Amos 'n Andy Institute of Tomcoonery and Porch Monkeyology".

Whatever. Jesse Jackson is dismissable. Say it, believe it and be liberated.

Thindwa ends on a hopeful note:

I have offered these views in the hope that black conservatives who are truly interested in changing the lives of black people for the better take another look at why their ideology has not taken root in the black community. It might comfort some to blame the “liberal media” for ignoring them. But let me suggest that black people have heard the black conservative message. They just don’t like what is being said and how it is being said.

Thindwa is welcome to correct his misrepresentations and step out of the dog vomit. Somewhere somehow, he has come to the conclusion that black conservatives are a pure product of white Republican propaganda, and his message to black people reinforces whatever ignorance is out there that believes the same thing.

My suggestion to Thindwa and anyone who buys his argument is twofold. The first is to ingest a healthy dose of Cobb on the regular. The second is to attempt, seriously, to understand the history of black conservatism. Not in the light of Katrina, or Bill Bennett or any of the reactionary stuff that was news in the past three months, but in terms of black history itself. Black conservatism is real and multivariate and here to stay. It exists on its own, and independent of Sean Hannity and whomever else everybody watches on television. Most clearly and importantly it exists here in the blogosphere and is being expounded by real people with real names living in the real world - not the false fantasy world of self-loathing, ass-kissing and ignorance he paints for the poor souls over at The Black Commentator ghetto.

Posted by mbowen at October 15, 2005 08:32 PM

Trackback Pings

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4505

Comments

Interesting defense.

Where were public Black conservatives concerning Tulia, TX? Larry Elder, who has written about the War on Drugs and it being wrong headed, had a great opportunity to build upon what he has written and said, and produced zip.

Where were the public Black conservatives when a study came out stating that employers appeared to discard resumes containing "ethnic sounding names" vs. "traditional names"?

Where were the public Black conservatives when a study done by doctors came out stating that Blacks, even when socio-economic status is taken into account, get less aggressive heart aliment treatment?

On Star Parker and welfare, I can show you a woman who was on welfare for 4 years, before her child went into elementary school. From some of the commentary that Parker has written or said, the woman I can point out was a "victim of government handouts" when it was far from the case.

Her husband died, she got fired, and she went on welfare while taking care of her child because she didn't trust day care and close family members worked during the day.

Plainly put, the public face of Black conservatives are what the writer is commenting upon. If it ain't you, fine it ain't you. But I STILL find it interesting that some Black conservatives get fired up over the image of the "sterotypical" Black conservative but say nothing about the "sterotypical" everyday Black person:

  • Depending on the government.
  • Always whining about racism.
  • Blindly following "Black leaders".
  • Not doing anything about negative aspects happening in the Black community.

Come on Mike. You KNOW what I'm writing is true. How is it that you can be so ticked off and justified in your ticked off-ness but people like me are dismissed as being a liberal and "on the plantation" when I'm ticked off about the garbage coming from "the Black right"?

Posted by: DarkStar [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2005 06:57 AM

I'm not. I mean I'm really not ticked off. I'm not an angry black conservative. I'm not about going around attacking and while every once in a while it's fun to jump into the partisan game, that's not the bottom line. I do believe that black conservatives have learned a lot more about politics than the rest because we have more critics. And I also think that black conservatives are the only one of the three branches of black political thought that offers something new and different to the majority of African Americans who simply haven't taken us seriously. But I also think that there are plenty of blackfolks (as I've said a dozen times) who could blithely walk into the arms of the Republican Party without changing values, but simply changing attitude.

I agree with you. There are always going to be some black conservatives that get on everybody's nerves. So what? Why do we need role-monkeys anyway? It's about the ideas and values. But sometimes it's about attitude and that kind of advocacy is grating sometimes.

Understand what I'm about here is presenting a coherent point of view as Cobb. I don't think I'm changing people's minds about conservatism, I think I'm changing their attitudes. What irks me is the disbelief that blackfolks can be genuinely conservative without having psychological defects. I mean it's the same kind of problem non-dysfunctional blackfolks face everywhere. It's like what you faced undergrad in Virginia. Nobody wanted to believe that you were upholding the best of your school's traditions. Too many people are quick to jump to the conclusion that everyone outside of their political worldview (or social worldview) is somehow corrupt or defective. I'm fighting against that. I'm not fighting against Liberals and Progressives so much as I'm fighting for the integrity of Conservatives.

As an African American, I'm fighting for the right to [influence the Republican] party. I'm fighting against the myth of the black monolith, and I'm self-interested in doing so. I think the Old School is the best way to be black, conservative and Republican, and I get crap about that even from within The Conservative Brotherhood. [Shrugs shoulders]. What can I say? I can't simply dump a lifetime of values just to be accepted, even in my own family. I'll take the heat for what I stand for, just don't misrepresent me and don't pretend I don't exist. Also don't mistake that I have a huge amount of existential coin dropped into this fountain. I could walk away tomorrow. It's not about me. I do like to keep my ideas about current affairs in blog form, and obviously I'm a compulsive writer, but I'm really just about ready to kick into Lucifer Jones. But I still have some Conservative Brotherhood work to do.

Posted by: Cobb [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 16, 2005 08:31 AM

Mike, I have a long simmering thought that I think is ready for the public square: the "Black conservative" vs. "Black liberal" "debate" isn't really about liberal vs. conservative ideas. It's about Democrat vs. Republican.

Posted by: DarkStar at October 16, 2005 11:35 AM

"I don't think I'm changing people's minds about conservatism, I think I'm changing their attitudes. What irks me is the disbelief that blackfolks can be genuinely conservative without having psychological defects. I mean it's the same kind of problem non-dysfunctional blackfolks face everywhere."

90% of all liberal criticism of Black Republicans is riddled with logical fallacies. 1) ad hominem attacks 2) hasty generalizations and 3) indirect appeals to the people

Good good, give in to your hate...

sorry.

but seriously....your hatred gives you focus Cobb. why not be pissed?

Posted by: Negrorage [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2005 01:22 PM

..because I really don't see my future as threatened if the black conservative movement fails. It may turn out to be as unnecessary as the black computer movement. The key to black success is social mobility, and that is not significantly constrained by a lack of GOP access. It might be tough for black millionaires with lower profiles than Ward Connerly, but I think they'll be ok.

Posted by: Cobb [TypeKey Profile Page] at October 17, 2005 01:48 PM

That comment about the woman who stayed home for four years shows what is wrong with our thinking. Women of all races have had to go out and work at certain times, kids or no kids. To expect other people to support while you stay at home is wrong.

Posted by: Anita at October 19, 2005 01:09 PM

And I agree with you totally, Cobb. Black people like to imagine that black conservatives don't know that there is racism or like racism or something ridiculous like that. What we're saying is, yes there is racism. Now what are you going to do? There are certain things that you should do. And some you should not. And if you do the wrong things, racism is not the excuse or the justification for your wrongdoing.

Posted by: Anita at October 19, 2005 01:11 PM