Cobb

I saw Bulworth at the dollar theater and just about got my money's worth.

It's a satire, man. That's why you saw "the most incredibily one dimensional parade of black ghetto stereotypes." But whatever. I'd pay a buck to look at Halle.

I suppose only someone who would think of Howard Dean as a good candidate would think of Bulworth as a good film. I seem to recall a lot of stuff like this:

In the 1998 black comedy, Bulworth, Warren Beatty plays a presidential candidate who takes out both a big insurance policy and a hit contract on himself. Senator Bulworth is consequently set free of all restraints, and says everything he wants to say instead saying what he should say. He goes to war against racism, economic inequity and the corruption of the political system itself.

It's hard to see this film and not want to immediately elect Jay Bulworth president. The in-your-face honesty of the protagonist would appeal to anyone, political values aside.

If you ask me, Bulworth's antics are exactly what Democrats pass off as 'race relations', and it is exactly how seriously they take black voters, in such a way that it can be mistaken for satire.

Your loyally oppositional critic never suggested anywhere, ever, that you cared for the movie Bulworth. Instead, his annoying auditory hallucination in your conscience suggested that your hyper-assimilationist politics are "Bulworthian"

Bulworth got it overtly right. I believe Cobb's unstated motive is Bulworthian.

Maslow forgot about generative imperatives, and in so doing, he neglected THE prime mover. As go these generative *instincts* so also the contingent levels of the hierarchy of needs.

IMOHO - the entirety of the culture war is about seignurial primacy and privilege.., here's a working title proposal, Who's Ya Daddy?" Progressive Patriarchy in the Fin d'Siecle American Republic

Methinkst, however, that while Bulworth's ego/persona collapsed under the sway of jes grew {however poorly that was depicted}, your ego/persona is hardening under the sway of an anglo-patristic hegemony that is fundamentally and fatally flawed.

My point to you, in the clearest possible terms, is that you've bought into what I consider to be a thermodynamically and morally bankrupt cultural ethos. BTW - I don't criticize you, but I will relentlessly exercise the duppified ideology you've elected to espouse.

Look on the bright side magne, it's a "that which does not kill you, makes you stronger" game proposition. If you're right, you'll only become a more articulate spokesman for the anglo-patristic absolutism you espouse. If you're mistaken, I'll eventually succeed in exorcising the defective meme that's taken root in your headbrain.

Can someone translate cnulan's response into plain English? Reading it gives me tired-head.

He's a crypto-progressive. Obscurity is part of the point.