� Big Iron, Big NT | Main | Political Death Warrant �
September 28, 2005
Superdome Mythbusters
What will you believe to be true about poor black people and why? This is the meaty question at the heart of a new storm brewing over what people purportedly knew about the situation on the ground in New Orleans. It comes as no surprise.
I have often been asked if I think America is a racist nation. I suppose the answer has to be yes, otherwise nobody would ask such a patently offensive question. But determining the degree of racism and what exactly that means is a science that by and large the public has abandoned. So just as the majority of Americans can't tell whether the circumference of the globe is closer to to 25,000 miles or 250,000 miles, a lot of us don't know crap about racism. All we know is "I'm not racist, yes racism does exist, but not as much as Jesse Jackson says". Bloody brilliant.
I think that the blogosphere, spearheaded by Dean Esmay whose righteous indignation I find admirable, can nail down some of the perpetrators. We want to know who participated in arguing based upon the stories of anarchy that surrounded the Superdome. I think that would be relatively easy to do - follow the trail of wags who were knocking Nagin. That would be my strategy. After all, we do have search engines for this type of thing.
Since I've already picked a nemesis for what it's worth, I refer you to Junkyard Blog, who thought it would be more appropriate to call New Orleans 'Mogadishu'.
I've already said:
America has, unwillingly to be sure, looked at black poverty and squalor dead in the face, longer than anybody ever wanted to - for weeks on end. This isn't the OJ Simpson trial, this isn't about Rodney King, it's about destitute black faces on the air 24/7. Enough so that just about everybody freaked out and said something stupid. From Barbara Bush, to Kanye West to Wolf Blitzer to Randall Robinson, the gaffes just gushed. Why? Because nobody knew how to handle a black catastrophe - which is poor black people taking center stage in America's living room.
But let's not mince words. New Orleans is a black vs white town. I was there this spring and all over the news was how clubs in the Quarter were getting sued for racial profiling. In addition to that, there is the kind of black poverty in New Orleans that defies cvility. It's very easy to take a wrong turn off the avenue and wind up in the third world, and everybody knows it. I'm talking dirt streets and standing water in the middle of the summer. There is a not-insignificant portion of New Orleans that a lot of people are glad to see washed into oblivion. But the people who lived there are now souls to be saved. Not everybody is willing to be charitable. Considering that disaster tends to bring out the best in people, what we haven't seen is the daily ugliness of racial New Orleans.
Outside of the human catastrophe, there are people whose interests it serves to highlight and exaggerate any situation that dehumanizes blackfolks. That's Class Three racism to be sure, but in this situation it is particularly ugly.
I say go get 'em Dean.
Posted by mbowen at September 28, 2005 09:43 AM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4433
Comments
" have often been asked if I think America is a racist nation. I suppose the answer has to be yes, otherwise nobody would ask such a patently offensive question."
no shit.
check out a recent republican martyr's recent fulmination:
" I do know that it's true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could -- if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down."
bill bennett "morning in america":
http://mediamatters.org/items/200509280006
how this kind of republican demonica passes as digestible chit chat boggles my freaking mind. do you, citizen cobb, really consider repub party-staples like bennett to be outliers? how harsh a hint will the kept company have to send before the hardsore revulsion sets in?
Posted by: bianco at September 28, 2005 06:39 PM
I read Freakonomics and I understand the import and context of the argument. It was the first thing that popped into my head, and sure enough, that was the context given at the site you cite.
I know Bennett well enough to know that he was speaking hypothetically.
Posted by: Cobb at September 28, 2005 08:37 PM
are you saying he was speaking hypothetically because you didnt spot a bent coathanger in his hand?
couldn't bennet have 'spoken hypothetically' by suggesting that you could cut down on crime by aborting both black & white babies -- since im sure its safe to guess that white men and women havent suddenly stopped breaking laws.
as it reads, his on-air comment defines a notorious percentage of black births as Born Criminals. i cant believe youre comfortable with this smug sentiment, cobb.
Posted by: bianco at September 30, 2005 05:07 PM
You're eating out of the hand of Pelosi. Stop chasing ghosts.
From the NYT:
"I was pointing out that abortion should not be opposed for economic reasons, any more than racism or for that matter slavery or segregation should be supported or opposed for economic reasons," he said. "Immoral policies are wrong because they are wrong, not because of an economic calculation. One could just as easily have said you could abort all children and prevent all crime, to show the absurdity of the proposition."
Mr. Bennett, who was the secretary of education in the Reagan administration and is the author of a best-selling book on morality, said he was referring to a debate in the online magazine Slate that had discussed race in the context of an argument about whether abortions contributed to lowering the crime rate. That debate, involving Steven D. Levitt, an author of the best-seller "Freakonomics," apparently appeared in Slate six years ago.
In an interview with Fox News, Mr. Bennett said critics had distorted his comments by omitting his statement that aborting all black babies would be "morally reprehensible."
"When that is included in the quote, it makes it perfectly clear what my position is," Mr. Bennett said, "They make it seem as if I am supporting such a monstrous idea, which I don't."
The Democratic Congressional leaders, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada and Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, both sought to put the remarks in the context of a Republican effort to court African-American voters. Mr. Reid said Mr. Bennett's comments would "feed the fires of racism," and Ms. Pelosi called them "shameful words."
Posted by: Cobb at September 30, 2005 05:28 PM
yo cobb, you're eating out of the hand of the Lugosi's. Stop chasing quotes.
think for yourself. use your own sentences. use your own eyes and your own mind about what bennet meant when he said the words "i do know". to mine, he said that he 'knows' aborting every black baby in the US will cut down crime. he is calling a solid percentage of blacks born criminals. so for the third time my man-- in your own words, and without cutting and pasting and pointing to "context" or the Steno York Times -- how can a guy with your tuned accuity defend these words as noble or thoughtful of accurate or human?
Posted by: bianco at September 30, 2005 05:51 PM
You haven't read Freakonomics, so you've never heard the argument before. You're shocked and scandalized. Poor you.
Posted by: Cobb at September 30, 2005 05:59 PM
did i need to read the Freakonomicon to grok the decline and fall of Jimmy the Greek?
Posted by: bianco at September 30, 2005 06:29 PM
ok so now you believe that Bennett is FOR abortion but only if the fetus is black. Plonk!