� Back to the Drawing Board | Main | Grass Roots Technology Projects Supporting Hurricane Katrina Relief �
September 18, 2005
Pluralism: A Rambling First Stab
Not more than a week ago, somebody progressive chided me for putting Pluralism at the bottom of the Old School Core Values. None of the values are in any order, but.. Just last evening, we in TCB have begun our own discussion about the meaning of the word.
I'd like to do some explaining about the context and my original intent in writing:
Pluralism We believe in a tolerant and open society, and we welcome all people to enjoy its benefits and responsibilities.
This is going to be difficult.
I guess I start with the basic premise of loving America. And then I say, whom do I love America for? My favorite toast is, "To us, and those like us.", the appropriate response is "Damned few left." But it is hardly a toast I would have as America's motto which is, I believe; "In God We Trust". In God We Trust is much more general than in "I have accepted Jesus Christ as my own personal savior." or any of a thousand creeds. You are very likely to hear me say "We believe in one Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church". I think it is an unquestionable axiom of our nations' first principles that as strange as that creed may sound to some people, that as an American citizen, you are bound to tolerate it. Not to accept it. Not to give it credibility. Not to trash it. But to tolerate it.
What is tolerance?
As I was writing it, that question was left mostly dangling. What I intended to stress was a rejection of intolerance, most specifically religious and racial bigotry.
Fifteen years ago, I read Harold Cruse's 'Plural but Equal', and the clearest thing I can say in summary is that 'Plural but Equal' means exactly the same thing as 'Separate but Equal' except that the separation is completely voluntary. If you're Mormon, you are free to hang out in any city in any state of the Union, but if you'd rather hang out in Salt Lake, we understand and we're cool with that. No love lost. To each his own. Live and let live.
But I recongize that such platitudes are unacceptable for zealots and activists. For many Americans are engaged in a struggle. They want to continually wage a Culture War. They are threatend by the status quo and they desire to persuade. They run the gamut from gentle persuasion to radicalism. But all of them have something in common, a creed, a dedication to goals they feel are superior to those of the average American.
When I was such an activist, I was progressive. To a certain extent I still am progressive. I was a reformer in every dimension. Now I am not. I am more interested in keeping that which works working, and I have lost all measure of contempt for the average American.
Inclusion vs Openness
I don't believe that America is inclusive. It is open. That means that this is a kind of first-come first-served society. There is an implicit open invitation to participate in the society at any level you can compete. But there is not any particular effort to make sure that everyone gets and explicit invitation. We figure that if you're all about it, you'll show up.
I think this is eminently fair and appropriate to a society as large and complex as ours. In fact, I don't think it should be any other way. So when I'm talking about a plural society I mean that the expectations should be largely the same for each of us. We rise according to our abilities and luck. This is a major virtue.
Inclusiveness, on the other hand is a minor virtue, but it is not something that should be handled as a large scale goal for society. It is one thing to build community, it is another to build a nation.
Posted by mbowen at September 18, 2005 11:49 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/4385
Comments
*thumbs up* great post.
Posted by: memer at September 19, 2005 06:35 AM
Cobb, I agree with your statement that you want to keep what works. Just this weekend I met with some old friends from Ethiopia. They came here with literally nothing but a suitcase. Now they all own businesses. Some went to college some did not. But they all work, they have houses. One is going to open another business. This is not possible anywhere else. The things that make such a life possible are made up of thousands of beliefs and habits, alot of which we are not even conscious of. These are the things that liberals and radicals want to destroy in the name of some kind of reform. My friends have had more problems with their countrymen than with Americans of any race. They have faced so much envy and malice from other Ethiopians and Africans, even attempts to ruin their businesses, such as false reports to authorities. It's an indication, just one, of why things don't work in other cultures. People resent success or anyone who is different or anyone who strives for anything. I think liberals are trying to create the same kind of mentality here. That way we will all be reduced to the same level of incompetence and fear.
Posted by: Anita at September 19, 2005 07:16 AM
"But I recongize that such platitudes are unacceptable for zealots and activists. For many Americans are engaged in a struggle. They want to continually wage a Culture War. They are threatend by the status quo and they desire to persuade. They run the gamut from gentle persuasion to radicalism. But all of them have something in common, a creed, a dedication to goals they feel are superior to those of the average American."
But you're waging a Culture War too Cobb. Every one of us has the desire to persuade or influence the culture. All culture is a war; and this desire always culminates in value positing. There is nothing "gentle" about pointing out the things that need to be "beat down" with Old School Values.
In other words, stop trying to separate yourself from the "zealots and activists". You are still a zealot insofar as you advocate the proliferation/aggregation of your "core values". You of all people should be willing to acknowledge that its a war of "values" v.s. "values" where U.S. citizens are concerned in general and U.S. Blacks in particular. I'm all for keeping what works working. But what to do about what clearly isn't working, beat the defects down with values, or let people succeed or falter as they please?
With regard to our own culture, how many conversations will Blacks have to have about who is/isn't Black before we realize the "value" of cultural relativism?
http://www.negrorage.com/index.php?p=48 -This is so far removed from your idealistic Pluralism value so as to make talk of tolerance seem hopeless. To me, any talk of universal values is pointless so long as the "not Black enough" phenomenon continues to persist. Does the solution to the "not Black enough" phenomenon (I'm assuming you consider it a problem) require us to beat it down with universally applicable Old School Values or does the solution lie in the realization that cultural relativism is a necessary and healthy development in a culture in which freedom is constantly being redefined?
How can we establish universal values when "values" have taken the place of "good" and "bad" proper? There are only two choices: universal values or cultural relativism, because you can't have both. Whether your arguing for universal values or cultural relativism, you're still a radical activist in the big picture, it just a matter of which side you're on.
That was only 4 questions. And don't get discouraged about throwing thoughts out into the Void. People are listening.
Posted by: Negrorage at September 19, 2005 08:13 AM
"There are only two choices: universal values or cultural relativism, because you can't have both."
mmm! chewy...
Posted by: memer at September 19, 2005 10:03 AM
Posted by: memer at September 19, 2005 11:59 AM
I'm not waging a culture war so much as I'm maintaining the bulwark of democratic principles against those whose politics are corrosive of democracy. I'm going to have to read Victor Davis Hanson to understand how the Core Values I state relate or don't relate to Western Values and a principled reading of the Classics, so I'll be mushy for a couple weeks. But I expect that it will become clear in ways I'll be able to demostrate better, that my opponents are angling towards destruction of America. In other words, it's really not about 'culture' with a lowercase c but with the upper case C.
It's not about browbeating the vulgarians (which i dont' mind doing) so much as it is raising the questions which pertain to the validity within the context of our civilization.
For example, I have a beef with hard afrocentrists because they say that keeping a 'slave name' is wrong. Yet none of them speak any West African languages appreciably. They denigrate Christianity in favor of loas and spirits without considering the values of Christianity. They essentially disregard the usefulness of black influence on Western values in the US, and call for a rejection of them to 'return' to [West] African traditions. So I'm not baggin' on them because I think their Dashikis are stupid, but because they would undermine principles if all of the implications of their protests were taken seriously.
Likewise, I wouldn't say that hiphop is a bad *form* of music, but that it's current *content* is awful. But if people would say that hiphop is not real hiphop if it didn't say 'fuck the police', then it's more than just a small-c culture war.
Posted by: Cobb at September 19, 2005 01:14 PM