� O'Neill Was Right | Main | The Elephant in My Backyard �
April 10, 2004
Blix' (Little) Bombshell
Hans Blix, frustrated internationalist, confirms what I've been saying all along. Italics mine.
But if getting Iraq right was tough, getting the diplomacy right was much easier. Reading this book one is struck by how, at the end, the United States had become uninterested in diplomacy, viewing it as an obstacle. It seems clear that with a little effort Washington could have worked through international structures and institutions to achieve its goals in Iraq. Blix and ElBaradei were proving to be tough, honest taskmasters. Every country -- yes, even France -- was coming around to the view that the inspections needed to go on for only another month or two, that benchmarks could have been established, and if the Iraqis failed these tests the Security Council would authorize war. But in a fashion that is almost reminiscent of World War I, the Pentagon's military timetables drove American diplomacy. The weather had become more important than international legitimacy.
So here's the calculation. Let's imagine that the Pentagon's best calculation was that if we waited 2 more months for the invasion of Iraq, we would have lost about 4000 more soldiers than we did. Would it be worth it for international support?
More specifically, if you were the President of the United States of America and the troops are sent into Iraq by your sayso, would you send them later knowing that decision would both cement your international coalition and kill 4000 more Americans. How many American troops are worth the diplomatic victory?
Have I made this point clearly enough? 4000 is a number picked out of thin air, but somebody had to make that decision and the Pentagon knows what that number is. If the number was negligible then we have a problem. The question, I think, most clearly falls on the head of Colin Powell. After all it was his doctrine was that we go in with the big force at the right time.
One more thing to consider here, which in a way typifies the nature of timetable justifications. We all know that some dodgy intel suggested that Saddam Hussein himself had been pinpointed. On that tip we launched several tons of cruise missles which hit their target but missed Saddam. This upped the original timetable by 2 or 3 days. One can argue that this kind of aggressive opportunism characterizes the Administrations persecution of this war. The only imprudence I see in that is political, and I sleep just fine with that.
Posted by mbowen at April 10, 2004 12:18 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1769
Comments
"Have I made this point clearly enough? 4000 is a number picked out of thin air, but somebody had to make that decision and the Pentagon knows what that number is. If the number was negligible then we have a problem. The question, I think, most clearly falls on the head of Colin Powell. After all it was his doctrine was that we go in with the big force at the right time."
Why Powell? Overwheling force may have been his doctrine but last time I checked, he was not currently Sec. of Defense, a Chief of Staff, or even in the military now. While I have lost all respect for the man, he is not to blame for this fiasco. In fact, he was for the most part cut out of the process by Cheney and Rumsfeld and Rice did little to help him.
Regardless, his doctrine (which is really just age old military common sense from Sun Tsu to Clauswitz) was not used in this war. The Rumsfeld way was to use fewer troops and optimize the use of techology. Well, technology is a great advantage but it takes boots on the ground with guns and much ammo to win wars like this one.
Posted by: walter at April 10, 2004 10:38 PM