� Cleaning Out My (XR) Closet | Main | Chu'ch �
January 05, 2004
Good Enemies, Bad Enemies
I've got a bad enemy, I think.
A good enemy is the kind who understands where you are coming from and dedicates themselves to the loyal opposition. A bad emeny is one dedicated to smear you as a foil to all they find good in the world. Sometimes a bad enemy can be useful, however. Those who cite the bad enemy against you identify themselves as similarly clueless, which saves you time in identifying the rabble. Sometimes as well, a bad enemy gives you a completely off-the-wall view of yourself that you couldn't imagine anyone having, thus strengthening previously unknown weaknesses. So in all that, enemies can be all good, if you know how to play them.
Today, I've been called out as a 'cheap labor conservative'. The best justification I can give for that label is that I am excited about poor people participating in free labor markets, specifically the Chinese, but certainly everyone in the Third World. But as he explains further, Campbell believes me to be a Keynesian. Not long ago I probably couldn't defend against that, because I've only come to realize that I am a Chicagoan. But in either case, it doesn't follow that I believe that black male unemployment, now quoted at somewhere north of 30 horrid percent, is due to welfare dependency and not institutional racism.
My theory is simple and has been consistent for a long time. Ghettoes work. When the Nationalists took power in South Africa in 1948, they looked to Jim Crow in America to craft their laws in order to oppress the black majority in that country. If ghettoization can work against a black majority, it sure as hell can wipe out a minority. For the full scoop, check out (black conservative, duh) Glenn Loury. This is precisely the situation of beat-up African Americans.
There are a lot of solutions to the ghetto problem most of which involve escape. Some involve destruction and one or two involve investment. My bad enemies tend to hate investment when it means white yuppies move in. Suddenly they start talking about economics, property values and changing the character of their old neigborhoods. You'd think they'd been paying attention to paleoconservatives. But I understand. Nobody like yuppies.
Be all that as it may I don't buy into micro-economics. Meaning I don't believe that 'family values' changes the unemployment picture. It's all about the infrastructure. So where I tend to part company with my pal Baldilocks who surprisingly seems to buy into that culture of poverty nonsense is that I say economics makes the community, not the other way around. You put a billion dollars of investment anywhere and suddenly people get happy and society starts to function properly. That is if that billion is in the hands of people who aren't crooks. A single mom can raise a black male child just fine, so long as she doesn't have to live in a burglar-bar neighborhood. A two parent household in the trailer park is still Raising Arizona. Nothing to brag about.
I've lived uptown, right around 125th and Broadway in Harlem, and I'm here to tell you it ain't pretty. There is no good work, there are no good schools, aside from the Garvey School right around there. The groceries ain't fresh, my car got broken into twice, parking is horrible, the park isn't safe and even the KFC is sub-par. Believe me when I tell you that clerks in the Mickey D's get into arguments every day about who's got a job and who doesn't know how to cook their own meals. The dysfunction grows on you. I got in the habit of buying an ice cream cone whenever I had to take a cab downtown. That way I had something to eat while I was waiting, and something to throw if the bastard left me at the curb. But I digress.
As I said, there are lots of ways to solve the ghetto problem, any solution that involves tens of millions of people is going to take a lot of time and a lot of money. African Americans who are stuck in ghetto are stuck, and mainstream solutions don't work for them, not because of a great contemporary racist conspiracy, but because a very old successful one that still works. But I, and I think any black person with half a brain knows that there is a difference between the Hill, the Hood, the Ghetto, the Projects and the Sticks. You cannot indiscriminately put all of us into any one bucket. The problems of the one are not the problems of the all.
So whatever the outcome of this high-falutin' blue ribbon committee, the answers are still going to be the same. If you're stuck in the Ghetto, your chances for American success are slim. It doesn't take a degree in economics to figure that out. Hell, Ron O'Neal just said so on Black Starz, and Super Fly was what? 1972?
So let me explain this patiently. It's not a black male problem, it's a ghetto economics problem.
Posted by mbowen at January 5, 2004 08:35 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1313
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Good Enemies, Bad Enemies:
� Welcome to My World from baldilocks
Looks like both Cobb and Prince C. have problem with my case for being a republican (even though I mostly agree with Cobb’s take on the subject). Sometimes a girl just can’t win. ;-) Cobb at least makes a well-reasoned [Read More]
Tracked on January 7, 2004 03:08 PM
� online pharmacy from online pharmacy
Please check out some information in the field of online pharmacy canada pharmacy [Read More]
Tracked on March 22, 2005 06:21 AM
Comments
I just picked one example of what *not* to do (as I did state). "Culture of poverty?" That Prince C. guy's got you wound up.
Posted by: Juliette at January 5, 2004 10:12 PM
I find it facinating that you can say "economics makes the community, not the other way around" and not realize that the republican/conservative economic policy is what's perpetuating ghettos in the first place.
Let me break this down into plain english.
The "somewhere north of 30 horrid percent" Black male unemployment rate leads to rising crime, more Black men in prison and other social ills I'm gonna assume you are against.
So that tells us that what we need to do is create more jobs.
But the problem comes with the conservative philosophy. By putting few to no limits on corporate global expansion, jobs, which would help the Black ghetto communities, end up in China, India, or the Third World, because of "cheap labor".
Well, maybe education is the answer? Get folks out of the ghettos by increasing education and then they won't need those "factory" jobs fleeing the country.
But the problem is that conservatives are in opposition to increased teacher pay, smaller class sizes, improvements in physical infrastructure, and anything else that might actually work in improving education.
So then maybe those Black folks need to go into business for themselves. Of course that's hard to do when you have a sub-standard education. Some try it. Mostly by drug dealing. Of course you would think a conservative would kinda see that as the American way, sell a product people want. But no. Conservatives hate "counter culture" so even smoking a joint deserves punishment. And to top it off they deny education benefits if you have any drug conviction – even for simple possession.
But all that works work out ok for conservatives. Prison is the only “social program” the they support anyway.
And I'm not really your enemy. I'm sure you want nothing but the best for our communities, but your philosophy leads to nothing but a perpetual torture chamber for the lower class in this country.
Posted by: Prince Campbell at January 5, 2004 11:48 PM
My philosophy is not stereotypical conservative philosophy. I join the Republican party specifically to correct it where it has gone wrong. Democrats haven't stopped the war on drugs in all these years.
I have no problem or qualms putting crooks behind bars and writing them off. I am, in all ways, looking to global standards. The war on drugs, fueled as it was by a culture war, was a huge mistake - but there's not going to be any recourse. What's done is done. It's not as if nobody knew a war was going on.
I agree with the idea of job creation, but I disagree that government can make work. Again, everybody knows what kinds of jobs are going to be happening in the US. The government is not your enemy in this (hmm am I overusing that word), but your neighbor who is willing to work cheaper.
The US poverty line is not an absolute poverty line. There are millions of Americans, in our internal Second Worlds who are surviving. There are relatively few (4000/year) who are literally starving. So we all have to face the simple reality that the more desparate man is going to work harder for less. I say let the desparate man work harder - don't try to lift all boats.
I beleive there is a legitimate question as to whether our economy works on all three levels, First World through Third. Our banking system favors middle class standards and up. It doesn't make sense that loans for 100 dollars charge 18%; the whole check cashing industry is a poison. The same goes for real-estate and health care.
But liberals must *absolutely must* start realistically dealing with class, instead of fronting with their egalitarian fakery, because no country's wealth is going to lift all boats. It simply doesn't work that way, and it never will. You can't force it. That means Wal-Mart employees get Wal-Mart benefits, not Nordstrom benefits, and if you try to monkey with the law to force it, Wal-mart goes overseas.
It's not as if poorer folks have a real choice, but thinkers ought to think about whether it is really more difficult to live on 10,000 a year in the United States or in Guatemala. If it is harder here, then policy needs to tend toward making the difference between here and Guatemala negligible with the aim of keeping jobs captive.
I don't want to hear "We can afford it." I don't see any black lower middle-class folks giving away money to 7 in a room South American immigrants. It simply doesn't work that way.
Posted by: cobb at January 6, 2004 07:51 AM