� The Trial of the Century, Not | Main | Nevermind: A Reversal on French Law �
December 17, 2003
The Morning After Pill & The Economics of Carefree Sex
The approval of the new day after pill will give us yet another choice in contraception. I don't have a problem with the principle of contraception, but I think that this is a step in the wrong direction.
A certain someone I knew, living in Southern California as she did way back in '88, had a certain amount of exposure to Mexican American women. In Mexico, it is perfectly legal to have an injection of depoprovera as a long term contraceptive. Apparently, it's perfectly legal now in the US, but at the time (way back in the 80s) getting the shot was a dodgy affair. You get a shot four times a year and the rest of the year, you relax.
You may recall the scandal over Norplant when conspiracy theorists claimed its invention was part of a campaign of sterilization against blacks and latinos. I don't doubt that it was probably over prescribed in such communities which is bad enough, but I took issue with the controversy in those days.
My argument has changed however. At the time in weighing lightly against Norplant, I was on my way to becoming organic. I argued that American life was needlessly complex and that our economy should conform to the shape of human life. God doesn't make mistakes. If young women are physically capable of having babies, society should be capable of accepting them. This was a strike back at the culture war. Ultimately I expected a high school education to be enough, and I expected that young couples should be capable of raising children given that education and the proper economy. My sentiment remains with the young couples, but I see it as pushing bourgie aspirations.
Folks who love to hate single mothers sit in dark political corners now that welfare and AFDC have been savaged. They have nothing left to talk about. It is not clear to me (I haven't read 'Nickeled and Dimed') that our internal Second World is not functioning well. But it is clear that our national culture is dominated by yuppie scum who don't understand or respect that Second World properly. Howard Dean is proof. And again I say the Democratic nominee should resemble a football coach with a fat head and a bushy moustache. Because a righteous blue collar politics is not present on the big stage, our political culture dogs all the creatures of Eminem's oevre. But you and I know the people who listen to DMX or Patsy Cline and drive trucks are as red-blooded as you and me, even though their blood may be thinned by Wild Turkey. Sentiment against broken homes and youthful pregnancy is heavily cultural and slightly socio-economic.
I believe the American Second World functions as well as any other Second World, they just don't get the respect of politicians. Keep this in mind when the six-figure journalists intone morally about the dangers of youthful sex. They themselves could not imagine their bourgie life saddled with rugrats, it doesn't mean women are incapable or those who do are inferior. That is economics talking. So the political sentiment in favor of a morning after pill is harmonizing with the pseudo-feminist idea of sexual liberation as in 'Friends'.
My daughters have been raised thus far in the kind of suburban environment that teaches charity towards others and believes that there are not tall buildings in Africa. I'm willing to wager, despite biology, that they are on track for the yuppie economy if not values. So I expect that childbirthing should be delayed. So it is very likely that I will get them a five year supply of Norplant for their 13th birthdays. But this is part of a plan, not a carefree 'choice'. The day after pill is carefree.
I don't want to make any value judgements about the kind of woman who doesn't know when she's going to need such a pill, but clearly the drug companies are invested in that being a market big enough to profit from. You can hear 'This just encourages irresponsibility!' dripping from my conservative lips.
So in respecting the fact that young women are going to choose pregnancy and it puts them into the Second World economy, rightly or wrongly, it is up to us in our class to respect them nonetheless. If America can sustain both a first and second world domestic economy integrated and unequal, then it is perfectly acceptable that we have all types of contraception available. But the day after pill makes me uneasy. It represents a huge investment in an irresponsible convenience. (And it's leading our women astray). It sells the carefree lifestyle of the first world sybarite to the second world market. That doesn't sit right with me. I can't respect the chooser equally to the planner and this gives the choosers one more choice.
Still, it's better than the choice of abortion.
Posted by mbowen at December 17, 2003 12:19 PM
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.visioncircle.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1195
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference The Morning After Pill & The Economics of Carefree Sex:
� Poor from aldahlia
I'm blogging to keep my mind occupied. If I tried to blog about my grandfather it would make things worse. So, instead, let's talk about being poor. I'm bringing up the subject because of an entry on Norplant, from uppity-negro.com.... [Read More]
Tracked on January 25, 2004 02:47 AM
Comments
Interesting take ... a couple of thoughts, and you touched on it with Nickle & Dimed. The issue, to me, is not our economic system (since I'm dubious of totalizing theories) but what kind of life do you want to lead.
That second world life you mentioned is tough in the U.S. -- it's a hard life to live poor amidst plenty, and I'm not sure you want it, and I'm not sure I'd dismiss others who don't want it as yuppie scum. In that second world you'll probably work just as hard as anyone else -- in fact, in many ways you'll work harder, but you'll be paid much less while others have much, much more.
With getting paid less is a requirement to think about money practically all the time -- you have to calculate pretty much every thing you're in a position to spend.
Then there's dignity issues: You're an adult and yet during work hours you might have to ask to take a bathroom break. You might have people far younger than you telling you what to do, and they may be clueless, snot-nose kids with a strong sense of entitlement and you'll have to listen and just take it. You may be fired or laid off for signs of independent thought, or just because the CFO needs to meet his revenue projections.
In other words, to use a military metaphor, in the second world here in the U.S., you are the equivalent of capitalist cannon fodder. You always want to be officer class, or at least work yourself to sergeant.
Plus, as you mention, there are behaviorial issues. Officer class gets away with things enlisted men and women don't. As a friend of mine said, if you're an officer, you got non-specific urethritis, if you're enlisted, you got the clap.
FWIW.
Posted by: IB Bill at December 18, 2003 06:28 AM
Good take.
Let me clarify one thing in this rather overloaded subject. I don't think one is yuppie scum to choose first world status in America. I think that those bobos that Brooks talks about are constantly looking up, and truly don't understand or respect second worlders. There are those who do, and I don't believe that Howard Dean is one of them, but they are generally not in control of things.
To extend your military metaphor, it's the noncom master chiefs and sargeants that are the gut leadership.
Posted by: Cobb at December 18, 2003 07:53 AM